Let's Keep Talking About LoveDavid Anguish Have you noticed our world’s interest in love? “We love baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and …” We love our parents, children, spouses, friends. But we also love a good thriller, romance, or biography. We love sports (pick your favorite), music (choose your genre), a good movie, or play. We love our country, a good parade, a quiet snowfall, leaves turning, birds singing, the mountains (or beach), a gorgeous sunrise/sunset, or napping while it rains on a tin roof. Of course, our culture’s primary uses of love regard relationships. The word is commonly used with one of three meanings: emotional, romantic, or sexual; sometimes the uses overlap. Given the many meanings we try to express with one word, we understand if some might be confused about the Bible’s teaching about love. The statement made to me by a good sister in my first work with a local church illustrates: “I know what Jesus said, but I just can’t love my enemy!” She referred to Matthew 5.44, but the unspoken question behind her declaration could have been, “Which of our world’s meanings of love did Jesus intend?” The short answer is, “None of the above.” But the question arises because our culture tries to do with one word what the Greeks did with multiple terms (sources vary, listing from 6 to 9 words; cf. e.g., “8 Greek Words” 2024). And unless we teach differently, and repeat the point often, we will be prone to use the word as our culture does and misunderstand the meaning the NT emphasizes. In Matthew 5, Jesus used ἀγαπάω (agapaō), the verb form of ἀγάπη (agapē); the forms appear in the NT 143 and 116 times respectively. Christians didn’t invent the word, but gave it a prominence it didn’t have in the Greek world. Agapaō first appears in Homer, but “agapē is unknown before its usage in the LXX” (Spicq 1994, 14), where the noun appears 19 times, and the verb appears 271 times (Taylor and Wheeler 2012). “Contrary to what is often written, no certain attestation is available in any papyrus from the pre-Christian era” (Spicq 1994, 15). In the NT, agapē “is the most rational kind of love, inasmuch as it involves recognition and judgment of value” (my emphasis). Agapaō “also often means ‘value, set great store by, hold in high esteem’” (Spicq 1994, 11–12). Depending on the context, which is always the final determinant of a word’s meaning, it is not always distinguishable from φιλέω/φίλος (phileō/philos). But—and note this—“people are never commanded to love one another with φιλέω or φιλία [Jas 4.4], but only with ἀγαπάω and ἀγάπη” (Louw and Nida, 1989, 293). This doesn’t mean agapē never includes friendship or affection; it certainly can. But, “while friendship is properly and only used of a relationship between equals, agapē links persons of different conditions …; it is disinterested and generous love, full of thoughtfulness and concern” (Spicq 1994, 13). In other words, to demonstrate agapē toward someone, I don’t have to like them (enemies), or even know who they are (disinterested); but I must do what is in their best interest—even if it costs me to do so. Consider some NT passages that show what agapē means in action. Matthew 5.43’s reference to loving neighbors and hating enemies—an expression of the Mosaic Law (Lev 19.18) and understanding of Jesus’ hearers—fits with modern uses of love: we love the people we feel good about, but not the people we don’t like. But verse 44’s “love your enemies” is at odds with modern use: by definition, enemies are not people we feel good about; yet Jesus tells us to love them. The parallel in Luke 6.27 shows what he means: “Love your enemies, do what is good to those who hate you.” Thus, we are closer to what Jesus intends if we translate agapē/agapaō with “esteem” or “value,” bearing in mind that “in the NT it would almost always be necessary to translate agapē as ‘demonstration of love’” (Spicq 1994, 12). Second, look at Romans 5.8, 10 alongside 1 John 4.9–10. Despite the fact that we were God’s enemies, he esteemed us so much that he sent his Son to be “the atoning sacrifice for our sins.” Finally, consider Luke 10.25–37. In his Good Samaritan story, told in response to the lawyer’s attempt to find a loophole in the second great commandment, Jesus transforms the question from “Who is my neighbor?” to “To whom should I be a neighbor?” That is, “Whom should I esteem?” As the lawyer correctly saw, only the Samaritan had valued, therefore loved, the beaten man. Jesus’ reply to the lawyer is his expectation for us: “Go and do the same.” Works Cited “8 Greek Works About Love That Will Make Your Heart Soar.” 2024. Dictionary.com. March 28. https://www.dictionary.com/articles/greek-words-for-love. Retrieved July 16, 2026. Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene A. Nida. 1989. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. United Bible Societies. Spicq, Ceslas. 1994. “aγάπη.” Theological Lexicon of the New Testament. Vol. 1, 8–22. Hendrickson Publishers. Taylor, Bernard A., and Dale M. Wheeler. 2012. Kraft/Taylor/Wheeler Septuagint Morphology Database. v. 4.10a. Oaktree Software, Inc.. All Scripture quotations not otherwise designated are from the CSB. Italics in biblical quotations are added by the author. Permission is granted to reprint original materials with the credit line, “Reprinted from David Anguish, ‘The Berea Page,’ July 21, 2026.” Contributions in support of my writing ministry (read more here) are appreciated. Click the button below to make a one-time or ongoing gift.
Featured from davidanguish.comFrom the Sermons & Class Notes page (here), "Transformed Esteem" (Rom 12.3) (here) — Against the backdrop of our culture’s self-esteem emphasis, we consider the better basis for that esteem as presented by Paul. Please forward to a friend and invite them to subscribe To read all archived issues of The Berea Page click here
"May grace and peace be multiplied to you" (1 Peter 1.2), David |
I publish two newsletters: [1]"Berea Page" (15 times a year) which includes a feature article (about 600 words), mainly focused on matters related to why we believe in Jesus, enduring trials and suffering with faith, and the relationship between faith and truth; and sidebar reflection quotations selected from my reading; and "Opening the Scriptures" (22 times a year),1000-1500 word expositions of selection from the biblical text. Both are archived at www.davidanguish.com
The Kingdom in Context David Anguish In seeking to understand the New Testament, it is essential to keep in mind that neither the documents nor the story they tell arose from a vacuum (see The Bible’s One Story). Ideas that are brought to fulfillment in the New Testament originate and are defined in terms of their use in the Old Testament and Judaism. Everett Ferguson elaborated on this point relative to the references to the kingdom in the Gospels: In the ministry of Jesus as described in...
Opening the Scriptures Then their eyes were opened and they recognized [Jesus], and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” ~ Luke 24.31-32 NIV 1 Peter, Introduction # 5 1 Peter's Readers and Their Circumstances David Anguish Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ: To those chosen, living as exiles dispersed abroad in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, chosen...
The Bible's One Story David Anguish "Why study the Old Testament? This question has echoed down through the centuries of church history” (Hill and Walton 2009, 11). Most believers affirm that, at some level, the church needs to study the OT. We’ve read the reasons identified in Romans 15.4 (“instruction”) and 1 Corinthians 10.11 (“warnings” [NIV]). We know the OT’s importance for providing the details needed to understand references to names and events in some NT passages (e.g., Jude 5–11)....