Defining "Kingdom"David Anguish In reflecting on the significance of Luke’s references to the “kingdom of God” in Acts for today’s church (see part 1, here), we should first remember that he is continuing the kingdom theme established by Jesus and reported in the gospels. We are especially concerned with its use in Luke, part one of his “narrative about the events that have been fulfilled among us” (Luke 1.1; cf. Acts 1.1). Recall that the noun βασιλεία (basileia), used eight times in Acts, appears 121 times in the Synoptic Gospels; 46 are in Luke. We must determine, then, what the writers of the gospels mean when they use basileia. In his study of the Sermon on the Mount, Glen Stassen shows the importance of this step when he writes, “But what does Matthew mean when he talks about God’s kingdom, God’s reign? It is a phrase so commonly used in Christian circles that it’s taken for granted, a fact that may actually hinder full and accurate understanding of the beatitudes and what they really mean, what they imply for our lives together” (Stassen 2006, 17). The task is more complex than it may appear. This is so, first, because the modern meaning of “kingdom” differs from its meaning in the biblical world. Dictionary.com, for example, gives six modern meanings of the word:
Do any of these meanings correspond to the biblical meaning? That question points to the second complexity, for determining basileia’s meaning in Scripture has proved challenging. In his study of God’s kingdom, for example, George Ladd notes “a bewildering diversity of explanations” (Ladd 1959, 15), and reviews four major views that have been prominent in church history. To those who would respond to this diversity with an appeal to “‘go directly to the Word of God and find out what it has to say about the Kingdom of God,’” Ladd replies, “The perplexing fact is that when we turn to the Scriptures, we find an almost equally bewildering diversity of statements about the Kingdom of God” (Ladd 1959, 16). He then devotes the next few pages to a survey of the biblical evidence (Ladd 1959, 16–18). Following Everett Ferguson’s direction, we’ll concentrate on the meaning of “kingdom” in the original languages of the biblical text. He writes, “In Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, the primary meaning of ‘kingdom’ is ‘kingship,’ that is, royal power or kingly rule. The words more often refer to ‘reign’ than to the ‘realm’ in which that rule is exercised, to the dominion rather than the domain” (Ferguson 1996, 19). Ferguson cites two passages to illustrate. Daniel 4.28–37 reports the loss and restoration of Nebuchadnezzar’s “vast power” (v. 30). Revelation 11.15 says that “the kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he will reign forever and ever.” Ferguson notes that, as is evident from the last clause of verse 15, where the verb βασιλεύω (basileuō) appears, “it is the rule, or sovereignty, that passes from the world to the Lord” (Ferguson 1996, 19). This doesn’t mean that “kingdom” never refers to a territory or political entity, for “kingship does not operate in a void.” A reign must occur somewhere (realm), have subjects (people), and have someone who is ultimately responsible for its well being (king) (cf. 2 Chron 20.30; Dan 1.20; Ezra 1.1). But in biblical use, the features of a “realm” are secondary to the primary meaning of a “reign” (Ferguson 1996, 19). Jesus’ parable in Luke 19.11–27 illustrates the relative importance of the primary and secondary meanings of basileia. In a story many of his hearers would have recognized as being similar to what had occurred ca. 40 BC when Herod the Great went to Rome to secure the Senate’s authority to rule the Jews (cf. Ladd 1959, 21), Jesus told a story in response to those who “thought the kingdom of God was going to appear right away” (v. 11). As the ESV more literally translates verse 12, he began, “‘A nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom [basileia] and then return.’” But what he actually went to secure is surely better translated in the CSB: “A nobleman traveled to a far country to receive for himself authority to be king and then to return” (cf. NRSV). The realm, people, and territory were important, but only secondarily to the right to reign. Works Cited Ferguson, Everett. 1996. The Church of Christ: A Biblical Ecclesiology for Today. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Ladd, George Eldon. 1959. The Gospel of the Kingdom: Scriptural Studies in the Kingdom of God. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Stassen, Glen H. 2006. Living the Sermon on the Mount: A Practical Hope for Grace and Deliverance. Jossey-Bass. See especially pp. 17–37. All Scripture quotations not otherwise designated are from the CSB. Italics in biblical quotations are added by the author. Permission is granted to reprint original materials with the credit line, “Reprinted from David Anguish, ‘The Berea Page,’ July 7, 2026.” Contributions in support of my writing ministry (read more here) are appreciated. Click the button below to make a one-time or ongoing gift.
Featured from davidanguish.comFrom the Articles, Teaching and Edification page (here), "Why Should We Sing?" (here) — An ancient believer teaches us what is most important in the church’s singing. Please forward to a friend and invite them to subscribe To read all archived issues of The Berea Page click here
"May grace and peace be multiplied to you" (1 Peter 1.2), David |
I publish two newsletters: [1]"Berea Page" (15 times a year) which includes a feature article (about 600 words), mainly focused on matters related to why we believe in Jesus, enduring trials and suffering with faith, and the relationship between faith and truth; and sidebar reflection quotations selected from my reading; and "Opening the Scriptures" (22 times a year),1000-1500 word expositions of selection from the biblical text. Both are archived at www.davidanguish.com
The Kingdom in Context David Anguish In seeking to understand the New Testament, it is essential to keep in mind that neither the documents nor the story they tell arose from a vacuum (see The Bible’s One Story). Ideas that are brought to fulfillment in the New Testament originate and are defined in terms of their use in the Old Testament and Judaism. Everett Ferguson elaborated on this point relative to the references to the kingdom in the Gospels: In the ministry of Jesus as described in...
Opening the Scriptures Then their eyes were opened and they recognized [Jesus], and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” ~ Luke 24.31-32 NIV 1 Peter, Introduction # 5 1 Peter's Readers and Their Circumstances David Anguish Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ: To those chosen, living as exiles dispersed abroad in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, chosen...
The Bible's One Story David Anguish "Why study the Old Testament? This question has echoed down through the centuries of church history” (Hill and Walton 2009, 11). Most believers affirm that, at some level, the church needs to study the OT. We’ve read the reasons identified in Romans 15.4 (“instruction”) and 1 Corinthians 10.11 (“warnings” [NIV]). We know the OT’s importance for providing the details needed to understand references to names and events in some NT passages (e.g., Jude 5–11)....