No "Love" in Acts?David Anguish A passing observation by a brother at a preachers meeting devoted to study and discussion prompted an examination of an important theme in the preaching of Jesus and the early church. He commented that, since the word love never appears in Acts, it is possible to evangelize without telling people that God loves them. I trusted his scholarship, but his statement piqued my curiosity. So, as soon as I could, I opened my Bible software and did a search. The noun ἀγάπη (agapē) appears 116 times in the NT; but not in Acts, Mark, or James. The verb ἀγαπάω (agapaō) appears 143 times, but not in Acts, Philippians, 1 Timothy, Titus, or Philemon. Acts is thus the only NT book in which neither the noun nor verb appear.{1} Next, I searched for the words in the writings of Peter and Paul, the principal preachers in Acts. Agapē is used 75 times in Paul’s writings, and four times in Peter’s; agapaō appears 34 times in Paul and five times in Peter. Since they are letters written to build up established churches, we expect to find less of an evangelistic emphasis in them than in Acts. As I worked through the passages where agapē and agapaō appear, I noted that when they are used, the words refer either to (a) the church’s one-another love, (b) love directed to a person of Deity by a believer, or (c) love directed to a believer by a person of Deity. Even when I attributed an evangelistic meaning in ambiguous texts where I thought one of the above ideas was probably intended, I identified only eight occurrences in Paul, and none in Peter, where the word love might have an evangelistic focus (Rom 5.8; 8.37; Gal 2.20; Eph 1.4; 2.24 [2x]; 2 Thess 3.18). All are reminders to believers of what they had already experienced.{2} So, if love was not the focus of the preaching in Acts, what was? As I investigated more, I found a number of words, but three stood out. The first is εὐαγγελίζω (euangelizō), often translated “preach the gospel” (ESV) (5.42; 8.4, 12, 25, 35, 40; 10.36; 11.20; 13.32, 33; 14.7, 15, 21; 15.35; 16.10; 17.18). Second is κηρύσσω (kēryssō), to proclaim (as a herald) (8.5; 9.20; 10.37, 42; 15.21; 19.13; 20.25; 28.31). Third are forms of words meaning “witness,” “bear witness,” or “testify” (μαρτυρέω, martyreō; διαμαρτύρομαι, diamartyromai) (1.8, 22; 2.32; 3.15; 5.31–32; 8.25; 10.39, 42; 18.5; 20.21, 24; 26.16; 28.23) (see studies of these words, here, here, here). Those verbs, and others with similar meanings, have multiple objects in Acts, e.g., “preaching that the Christ is Jesus” (5.42) “preaching the word” (8.4), “preached the gospel” (16.10), and so on. But one term appeared eight times as the object of their proclamation, first in a reference to the declarations of the risen Jesus: “He presented himself alive to them after his suffering by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about [λέγων, legōn] the kingdom of God [τῆς βασιλείας τοῦ θεοῦ, tēs basileias tou theou]” (Acts 1.3). The other seven are:
As it happened, during the period I was doing the above study, I was also teaching a class on the Sermon on the Mount, a text in which basileia is both part of the setting and an important theme. It’s a big idea in the Gospels as a whole, of course, where basileia occurs 126 times, 121 of which are in the Synoptics (Matthew, 55; Mark, 20; Luke, 46; John, 5; it occurs only 36 times in the rest of the NT.) Having been reminded of the importance of basileia in the Gospels and seeing its recurrence in Acts, I asked other questions. What are the origins of the idea? What is its meaning and significance in Scripture generally and in the NT in particular? In the ministry of Jesus? In the teaching of the church? What was involved in its proclamation, and what does that suggest for today’s church? Good questions to take up at another time. Notes {1} Note that φιλέω (phileō) never occurs in Acts either; φίλος (philos) occurs three times, all translated “friends” in the ESV (Acts 10.24; 19.31; 27.3). {2} John’s writings, of course, alter the picture, but the point of this exercise was to focus on Acts and the preachers featured there. For Further Reading Ferguson, Everett. 1996. The Church of Christ: A Biblical Ecclesiology for Today. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. See pp. 18–36. Green, Joel B. 1995. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge University Press. See especially pp. 76–101. Ladd, George Eldon. 1959. The Gospel of the Kingdom: Scriptural Studies in the Kingdom of God. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Stassen, Glen H. 2006. Living the Sermon on the Mount: A Practical Hope for Grace and Deliverance. Jossey-Bass. See especially pp. 17–37. Wright, N. T. 2012. How God Became King: The Forgotten Story of the Gospels. HarperOne. See chapters 6 and 7, pp. 105–154. All Scripture quotations not otherwise designated are from the ESV. Italics in biblical quotations are added by the author. Permission is granted to reprint original materials with the credit line, “Reprinted from David Anguish, ‘The Berea Page,’ June 23, 2026.” Contributions in support of my writing ministry (read more here) are appreciated. Click the button below to make a one-time or ongoing gift.
Featured from davidanguish.comFrom the Essays, Papers, and Reviews page (here), "Peter's Comeback" (here) — In John 21:15–19, Jesus reversed Peter's denials, his most spectacular failure, restoring him to favor and commissioning him for his life's service. Please forward to a friend and invite them to subscribe To read all archived issues of The Berea Page click here
"May grace and peace be multiplied to you" (1 Peter 1.2), David |
I publish two newsletters: [1]"Berea Page" (15 times a year) which includes a feature article (about 600 words), mainly focused on matters related to why we believe in Jesus, enduring trials and suffering with faith, and the relationship between faith and truth; and sidebar reflection quotations selected from my reading; and "Opening the Scriptures" (22 times a year),1000-1500 word expositions of selection from the biblical text. Both are archived at www.davidanguish.com
The Kingdom in Context David Anguish In seeking to understand the New Testament, it is essential to keep in mind that neither the documents nor the story they tell arose from a vacuum (see The Bible’s One Story). Ideas that are brought to fulfillment in the New Testament originate and are defined in terms of their use in the Old Testament and Judaism. Everett Ferguson elaborated on this point relative to the references to the kingdom in the Gospels: In the ministry of Jesus as described in...
Opening the Scriptures Then their eyes were opened and they recognized [Jesus], and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” ~ Luke 24.31-32 NIV 1 Peter, Introduction # 5 1 Peter's Readers and Their Circumstances David Anguish Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ: To those chosen, living as exiles dispersed abroad in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, chosen...
The Bible's One Story David Anguish "Why study the Old Testament? This question has echoed down through the centuries of church history” (Hill and Walton 2009, 11). Most believers affirm that, at some level, the church needs to study the OT. We’ve read the reasons identified in Romans 15.4 (“instruction”) and 1 Corinthians 10.11 (“warnings” [NIV]). We know the OT’s importance for providing the details needed to understand references to names and events in some NT passages (e.g., Jude 5–11)....