|
Two Notes Re: the Last Issue (7/14) — The transition of my website to a new host and the process of connecting that host with my email distribution service resulted in several emails of the last issue being sent to spam folders. If you did not receive Issue 7/14, “Jesus the Warrior,” in your inbox, you can read the archived copy here. Also, thanks to one sharp-eyed reader, I was made aware of a citation error in paragraph 7 of Issue 7/14. It has been corrected in the archived version. Completing Christ's AfflictionsDavid Anguish In view of our recent focus on balanced teaching about Jesus (here, here), a point of emphasis discovered in preparation to teach a text from Colossians arrested my attention. The passage begins at Colossians 1.24, a verse we may gloss over as we focus on Paul’s exalted statements about Christ and his warning about a human philosophy. In the order of the Greek phrases, the verse says, “Now I rejoice in the sufferings on your [plural] behalf and I am filling up what is lacking of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh on behalf of his body, which is the church” (my translation). N. T. Wright succinctly asks the question with which commentators wrestle: “How can there be anything lacking in the sufferings of Christ?” (Wright 1986, 87). But in light of his statements about Christ’s nature and work to reconcile and present God’s people as holy (1.15–22), Paul cannot mean anything was lacking from Christ’s redemptive sufferings. In fact, the entirety of the section beginning at verse 24 confirms that his focus is on his own afflictions, not the redemptive sufferings of Christ. He saw suffering as integral to the fulfillment of his “commission” (οἰκονομία, oikonomia) as God’s “servant” (διάκονος, diakonos) (v. 25 CSB). As he elaborates on what is entailed in remaining steadfast and stable in the faith (1.23), Paul uses multiple words with similar meanings: “sufferings” (πάθημα, pathēma; 1.24), “afflictions” (θλῖψις, thlipsis; 1.24), “toil” (κοπιάω, kopiaō; 1.29), “struggling” (ἀγωνίζομαι, agōnizomai; 1.29), and “struggle” (ἀγών, agōn; 2.1). In stressing his suffering in Colossians 1.24—2.5, Paul restates an idea he elaborates elsewhere (cf. Rom 8.17; 2 Cor 1.5–6; 4.10–12; Phil 2.19). Indeed, in one text, which, because of the predominant way the church has used the word “fellowship,” may be jarring to modern believers, he says he wants to participate in “the fellowship of his sufferings” (κοινωνίαν τῶν παθημάτων, koinōnian tōn pathēmatōn; Phil 3.10; cf. 1 Pet 4.13). The idea that suffering service is integral to our calling as disciples traces back to Jesus. To consider only selected texts from one of the Gospels, we begin with Mark 8.31–38 where Jesus responds to Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ” (v. 29), by announcing his impending suffering and calling his disciples to self-denial and cross-bearing. Verse 31’s prediction of suffering (πάσχω, paschō; cf. pathēma, Col 1.24) is the first of three in Mark (cf. 9.30–32; 10.32–34). Immediately after the third, James and John approach Jesus to ask for prominent power positions in his kingdom. In reply, he introduces the subject of suffering service, asking if they are willing to share his “cup” and “baptism.” He asks that question in light of his emphasis on the menial service that both Greco-Roman and Jewish cultures considered undignified (Inrig 1983, 336–337). When the other ten express their indignation at the brothers’ request (v. 41)—one suspects they were angry the siblings got there first—Jesus says they must reject the world’s view of self-development in favor of his reign’s inverted values. “Whoever would be great among you must be your servant [diakonos], and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve [διακονέω, diakoneō], and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10.43–45). In Mark 10, Jesus establishes a vital aspect of the “image” (εἰκών, eikōn; 2 Cor 3.18; cf. Col 1.15) disciples are to emulate. But, as David Garland has observed, it is as out of step with our world as diakonia was with theirs: “Today, most people view pain and suffering as a curse.… In today’s world we expect people to rejoice in their accomplishments, their blessings, their health and wealth. Consequently, Paul’s rejoicing over his suffering jolts a worldview that values comfort and ease as the highest good” (Garland 1998, 127). We expect as much; the world will think and do what the world thinks and does. What we should ask is whether the image we project as Christ’s body is different from the world’s. Do we project the well-rounded image of Jesus we see in Scripture or selectively accommodate our own comfortable values? Which texts about Jesus and his way do we repeatedly emphasize? Which do we never teach? What are the dominant messages of the songs that comprise our weekly repertoire? What biblical themes are never featured in our teaching and admonition (cf. Col 3.16)? As we think about imitating Paul as he imitated Christ (1 Cor 11.1), are we teaching and living as he did? It matters, for “he understood that his apostleship involved ‘work to be done and sufferings to be borne if the body of Christ is to be built up and the life of Christ to be diffused to new members’” (Garland 1998, 128; citing Ahern 1960, 28). Works Cited Ahern, Barnabas Mary. 1960. “The Fellowship of His Sufferings (Phil 3, 10): A Study of Paul’s Doctrine of Christian Suffering.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 22. In Garland 1998. Garland, David E. 1998. Colossians and Philemon. The NIV Application Commentary. ed. Terry Muck. Zondervan Publishing House. Inrig, J. Gary. 1983. “Called to Serve: Toward a Philosophy of Ministry.” Bibliotheca Sacra. Vol. 140, No. 560 (October–December): 335–349. Wright, N. T. 1986. The Epistles of Paul to the Colossians and to Philemon: An Introduction and Commentary. The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. All Scripture quotations not otherwise designated are from the ESV. Italics in biblical quotations are added by the author. Permission is granted to reprint original materials with the credit line, “Reprinted from David Anguish, ‘The Berea Page,’ June 9, 2026.” Contributions in support of my writing ministry (read more here) are appreciated. Click the button below to make a one-time or ongoing gift.
Featured from davidanguish.comFrom the From the Articles for Teaching and Edification page page (here), "Give Us More Andrews" (here) Please forward to a friend and invite them to subscribe To read all archived issues of The Berea Page click here
"May grace and peace be multiplied to you" (1 Peter 1.2), David |
I publish two newsletters: [1]"Berea Page" (15 times a year) which includes a feature article (about 600 words), mainly focused on matters related to why we believe in Jesus, enduring trials and suffering with faith, and the relationship between faith and truth; and sidebar reflection quotations selected from my reading; and "Opening the Scriptures" (22 times a year),1000-1500 word expositions of selection from the biblical text. Both are archived at www.davidanguish.com
Opening the Scriptures Then their eyes were opened and they recognized [Jesus], and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” ~ Luke 24.31-32 NIV 1 Peter, Introduction # 1 A Bona Fide Spiritual Adviser A Precursor to a Study of 1 Peter David Anguish In his devotional commentary on 1 Peter, E. M. Blaiklock, a self-described “professional classicist and historian” who...
Opening the Scriptures Then their eyes were opened and they recognized [Jesus], and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” ~ Luke 24.31-32 NIV James, Topical Studies # 2 Enduring Perseverance: A Word Study David Anguish I first recall hearing Rudyard Kipling’s poem, “If,” in John Facenda’s narration of film clips chronicling the rigors of NFL football in the 1960s and...
Jesus the Warrior David Anguish In a notable passage, J. B. Phillips critiqued a caricature of Jesus that, in the phrasing used previously, leans too hard into his “coolness.” After citing two lines of verse — “‘Gentle Jesus, meek and mild / Look upon a little child’” — Phillips asks, Why “mild”? Of all the epithets that could be applied to Christ this seems one of the least appropriate. For what does “mild,” as applied to a person, conjure up to our minds? Surely a picture of someone who...